Drug makers hiding clinical trial data from public

Big Pharma’s cat-and-mouse game can kill

Email communciation from Dr Glenn S. Rothfeld. M.D.


It’s a secret operation, one that would put the CIA and the KGB to shame!

Every time you take a prescription pill, you’re putting your life into Big Pharma’s hands.

And you want to believe they’ve provided all the information that you and your doctor need to keep you safe from serious side effects, of even death.

But a new study has found that major drug companies have been engaging in a cat-and-mouse game for years. One that’s designed to keep you from ever knowing just how dangerous their meds can be.

Researchers from the New York University School of Medicine poured through the records of every single new drug the FDA approved in 2012.

And it turns out that more than a third of the clinical trials behind these meds were never released to the public — even though the drug companies are legally required to do so. Now most of my patients don’t exactly spend their time combing through the statistical gobbledygook of clinical trials.

But I do. These trials help me understand a drug’s benefits — and its risks — before I ever prescribe it to you.

And the fact that the drug companies are sitting on information that they don’t want me — or any other doctor for that matter — to see is alarming.

Especially when withholding this information has been proven to cost lives.

You may remember that the painkiller Vioxx was recalled about a decade ago after patients started dropping dead from heart attacks. But what you may not have heard is that there was a clinical trial that showed the drug doubled your heart attack risk — but Merck never released it.

Sometimes Big Pharma will hide a clinical trial because the study proved that a drug doesn’t work — and publishing the information could cost a company billions.

That seems to have been the case with Roche’s anti-flu med Tamiflu. Roche finally released unpublished clinical data on Tamiflu after countries like the United States spent a fortune stockpiling it.

And guess what? The classified information that they kept so hush-hush was that the drug isn’t particularly effective. It shortens the flu by a handful of hours, at most.

Keeping you in the dark may make Big Pharma a fortune, but it’s not good for anybody’s health.

. . .

To Your Health,

Dr. Glenn S. Rothfeld, M.D.

Scandal hits the CDC – scientists “falsified” vaccine data – Dr Frank Shallenberger

Not about hormones or natural desiccated thyroid but about supposed “evidence based medicine” such as we are told to accept.

Email communication – “Second Opinion – Health Alert”, 23 December 2015

This article contains this interesting insight:

“The story goes deeper and should give pause to any doctor who still believes that Big Pharma money can’t do pretty much whatever it wants to do to get the results it wants to see.”

Scandal hits the CDC – scientists “falsified” vaccine data

The beginning of the end is here. I’m talking about the beginning of the end of your right to refuse having unproven and dangerous vaccines or drugs injected into your body or your child’s body.

As is often the case, California is setting the standard. Mandatory vaccinations are scheduled to begin this January in California. If you don’t get the vaccinations, your child cannot go to school. Yes, you still have to pay your taxes to fund the school system, so all of the vaccinated children can have a place to go. It’s just that your child won’t be able to go unless you inject him with biological agents and chemical adjuvants. But most doctors, the news media, and many people continue to argue, “Where’s the proof that vaccines are dangerous?” You won’t believe the answer to that question. It’s on the editing floor!

Dr. William Thompson is a senior scientist at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). The CDC is the government institution that studies the effects of vaccines on children and adults. Fifteen months ago, the good doctor became a whistleblower when he admitted that a 2004 CDC study that he was a part of was falsified in order to show that there was no link between the MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella) vaccine and autism. And now we know why no link was found.

Dr. Thompson says the authors of the study, including him, deliberately omitted crucial data to hide the connection. When they included the data, the study found a 240% increase in autism among African American children and a 69% increase in all children who were vaccinated with the MMR vaccine before 36 months of age. Apparently, Dr. Thompson’s conscience finally got the best of him.

In August of 2014, Dr. Thompson said, “I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the Journal of Pediatrics.”

He then admitted under oath that the CDC falsified data in order to deny the link between vaccinations and autism. And that’s not all. The story goes deeper and should give pause to any doctor who still believes that Big Pharma money can’t do pretty much whatever it wants to do to get the results it wants to see. Dr. Thompson also said that senior CDC researchers tried to destroy all the documents related to the cover-up. However, Dr. Thompson has saved these documents! Here is his amazing statement:

“At the bottom of Table 7, it also shows that for the non-birth certificate sample, the adjusted race effect statistical significance was huge. All the authors and I met and decided sometime between August and September ’02 not to report any race effects for the paper. Sometime soon after the meeting, we decided to exclude reporting any race effects, the co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can. However, because I assumed it was illegal and would violate both FOIA and DOJ requests, I kept hard copies of all documents in my office and I retained all associated computer files. I believe we intentionally withheld controversial findings from the final draft of the Pediatrics paper.” So things are really hitting the fan now, you say? Not so fast on that one.

The CDC denies all wrong doing. But the CDC is the largest purchaser of vaccines in the world, buying billions of dollars’ worth of vaccines each year. So with that amount of money on the table, their response is not necessarily completely believable. And to date, there have been no Congressional hearings at all looking into the scandal. What’s more, the mainstream media has refused to talk about it. For Big Pharma, it’s business as usual. Many Californians are forced to vaccinate their children even if they don’t want to simply because they aren’t able to homeschool their children or rich enough to pay for a private school. Pregnant women, children, and others are still told that vaccines are completely safe. So, is there any good news here at all? There is one bit of positive news.

One courageous Florida congressman has spoken in front of Congress twice about this issue. His name is Bill Posey. Dr. Posey is demanding his colleagues call hearings on this matter. It’s time to speak up. Please call your congressperson today to tell them that at the very least they should join with Dr. Posey and demand a congressional hearing on this matter to find out the truth. You can find the contact information for your representative at: http://www.contactingthecongress.org/

Virtually every single one of my patients with an autistic child tells me that the problems started shortly after a vaccination. Is this just coincidence? Should these parents continue to be completely ignored? Should Dr. Thompson’s amazing confession be ignored? A dangerous precedent has now been set leading to the time when, at its discretion and against your will, you and your children will be forced to take anything Big Pharma wants to feed you. It could be the beginning of the end.

Yours for better health,

Frank Shallenberger, MD

Will CDC whistleblower on vaccines testify before Congress? By Brian Shilhavy, Health Impact News. December 4, 2015. http://healthimpactnews.com/…/will-cdc-whistleblower-on-va…/

Letter from Dr Thierry Hertoghe, M.D.

There are several articles on this website about the terrible ordeal mother Mary Kidson had to go through in the UK, including going to jail, in order to get her daughter treated, and made well, with hormones.

This letter from Dr Thierry Hertoghe, M.D., December 24th 2015, thanks all those who supported him and Mary throughout this case and who were prepared to testify regarding the benefits of their own hormone treatement.

Strength in numbers?

Hormone Rights International

Dear Friends, Helpers, Patients ,Physicians from all over the world,

You must remember the indignified feelings that flowed by thousands from all over the world to England 1 to 2 years ago when the English health and police systems hardhandly interrupted the hormone treatments prescribed by me to the 14-year-old Victoria. These hormone treatments were getting her, finally after six long years, out of an extreme chronic fatigue state that had left her unable to attend school. Her mother Mary Kidson was put preventively into prison, because of the bringing of her child to my Brussels’ consultation and because her daughter out of desperation had phoned her too often from the psychiatric institute. These terrible traumas ended in:

•a collapse of the court trial against Mary Kidson and her acquittal in November 2014. The court trial was prematurely finished because the prosecution hadn’t been able to show any proof of wrongdoing. I did, however, have as Victoria’s physician the opportunity to testify during the time reserved for the prosecution, but the acquittal made it unnecessary that other parts of the defence with its many witnesses were presented.

•However, it took 8 more months because Victoria could come back home in June 2015 to her mother, the person who cared the most for her. It took several more months before the social services who neglected the conclusions of the trial, stopped imposing supervision.

Now everything is back to normal and OK again. This is all thanks to you all. You have been nearly a hundred to provide precious testimonies of your own medical treatments, which we have been able to present to the court, and thousands to sign the online petitions.

Here are the words of Mary: “Please do let everyone know and also give them our very grateful thanks for their support and kindness – we would not have won without them nor would Victoria be home.”

This is true. This is your victory too. Your interventions have made the world a little better. Justice has prevailed. Not only have you helped by putting pressure on the medical and legal authorities, but your support has helped Mary and Victoria of knowing they were not alone, that some people out there in the big world cared for them.

Thanks warmheartedly and a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, you fully deserve it.

Thierry Hertoghe, MD

President of the International Hormone Society

Discover www.lifespan-journal.com and enjoy latest breakthroughs in Lifespan Medicine.

Our contact details are:
E-mail: wosaam@wosaam.ws
Phone: +352 – 621 20 42 89

Lead Developer Of HPV Vaccines Comes Clean, Warns Parents & Young Girls It’s All A Giant Deadly Scam

This was supposedly ”Evidence Based Medicine” “As the world’s pharmaceutical giants continue to be driven less by moral accountability and more by profit and shareholder-driven bottom lines, we are going to see more and more products such as this vaccine which are marketed as ‘essential to one’s survival.’ ”


Prevention the best medicine

Another gem from “The Business Times” in 2002. Marion Gluck, then visiting Singapore, talks so much good sense about integrative medicine in this interview. Yet where has it all gone in Singapore?

Singapore could be (was to some extent) such a great centre for medical tourism for those seeking integrative care in this part of the world but instead now those who live here have to travel overseas for care like this. Meanwhile Dr Gluck continues to prescribe the medicine we all long for from her clinic in London.

Prevention the best medicine
Corinne Kerk
Business Times, Saturday, 19 January 2002, Page: 15
Singapore Press Holdings Limited

Wellness should be the key concern of medical bodies which should concentrate on preventing rather than curing illnesses. Dr Marion Gluck shares her views with CORINNE KERK

SHE was sitting by the window when we entered the room, staring out onto the busy road below, her knees pulled to her chest. Her short, curly hair is in a state of funky disarray, with some white strands peeping out in that “I don’t care if I show my age” sort of way.

But she jumps to her feet quickly when she sees us and her face breaks into a big, bright smile.

Meet Marion Gluck, born in Poland, trained in medicine in Hamburg, worked in Germany, Nepal and Iraq (yes, Iraq) and now an Australian citizen and passionate advocate of holistic preventive medicine.

“I have healthy women who want to know what they can do to stay healthy, fit and well,” says the Sydney-based Dr Gluck who was in town recently. “And the way I work is I deal more with wellness than illness.”

The 51-year-old first went into medicine because she likes people and doesn’t like illnesses.

“But when I finished studying and started working in hospitals, I saw that medicine can be unkind, invasive and painful,” says the mother of a 16-year-old son. “Doctors are meant to heal but we cause pain. And some diagnoses and treatments are painful, but patients don’t have a choice, they feel like victims and I wasn’t comfortable.”

The other push factor is the widespread use of prescriptive drugs, which she says causes too many side effects and other illnesses.

“It led me into holistic or integrative medicine, which encompasses everything about the person,” says Dr Gluck. “This integrates all modalities to help a person, whether it is counselling, lifestyle, diet or Chinese medicine. There are so many roads leading to Rome. So you can integrate the best of all worlds and individualise treatments.”

For starters, Dr Gluck says it is necessary to spend a lot of time with patients, talking to them and asking and answering questions.

“Patients don’t want to be treated as symptoms,” she emphasises. “They need to be educated. Then they will feel empowered because they’re responsible for their health, and they have choices and can do something about it. It’s different from just going to a doctor.”

This means trying to ascertain if there are problems patients are facing at home or at work and how these affect them.

“Of course, I use labs and biology and so on, but a lot boils down to bedside manner, and long consultations do not make money, while testing does.”

Indeed, Dr Gluck – who was formerly president of the Australian Overseas Trained Doctors’ Association and one of its political activists – is especially critical of the corporatisation of medical care, and of sending patients for too many tests.

“Medicine is becoming corporatised and patients don’t like it because they become a number,” she says in indignation. “They may have more beautiful rooms and the doctors have better computers, but it’s no longer personalised. Then doctors need as many patients to go through their clinics, take X-rays, do lab tests and see their specialists as possible. Patients fall into this and the bottom line is profit.”

Interestingly, however, Dr Gluck – who specialises in women’s health and in particular, natural hormone replacement therapy (nHRT) – is now part of a grouping of holistic healthcare practitioners in Sydney. The centre for integrative medicine brings together practitioners such as doctors, naturopaths, masseurs, and biological dentists. Basically, people who share the philosophy of holistic healthcare and who will only use “materials as natural and biological or organic as possible”.

But will they not fall into the same trap as corporatised medical groups which she finds so disagreeable?

“No,” she claims. “Because we charge more. With corporatised medical groups, the health insurance in Australia covers the costs and patients don’t have to pay. But with us, there’s a gap between what the insurance pays and our charges, and when patients pay, they value what they’re getting.”

She points out that there are also compounding chemists in Australia who are “going back to the old-fashioned way of tailor-making medicines” for individual patients.
And in her area of speciality, that is, nHRT, she uses hormones that are bio-identical to those of human’s.

“I do prescribe antibiotics where necessary and I do quite a lot of testing because it gets me information, but I avoid invasive tests or those that involve a lot of radiation,” she says. “I use both conventional and less conventional methods such as blood, saliva, hair and stool tests.

The benefit of integrative medicine is that you use all that is available as long as they’re safe and there are no side effects. There is no dogma.”

And if there are side effects?

“Then it’s not working,” she says firmly. “We always try through lifestyle, diet, vitamins and nutrients to enhance well-being. Or if you need to take medication, don’t take a high dosage so you can limit the amount of harm you may do through your treatment. Otherwise, for instance, if you take an anti-inflammatory medicine for joint pain, you may get a stomach ulcer and then have to treat that as well.”

And if someone is depressed, anti-depressants shouldn’t be the first course of action, she feels.

“You use all methods till they don’t respond, then you give them a prescription. It’s a lot more hard work, but it’s more rewarding. And the whole idea is that you inform them that they have a choice and it’s many things.”

But most of all, she believes it’s important for medical bodies to monitor health and well- being and concentrate on preventing rather than curing illnesses.

“I hope government bodies will realise you have to spend money on prevention, and educating and empowering the population,” says Dr Gluck. “And government and health insurance should pay for health prevention because it’s ultimately much cheaper.”

Why you should not avoid hormone replacement therapy

Estrogen Could Have Prevented Almost 50,000 Deaths

Dr Mercola

8 August 2013

This long and informative article contains these two paragraphs of particular interest to HCS:

Ideally use Bioidentical Hormones

Premarin (the most popular estrogen replacement) comes from horse estrogens and is not bioidentical. While it may sound “natural,” I recommend avoiding animal estrogens for hormone replacement, as there are excellent human bioidentical estrogen hormones easily available through any compounding pharmacist. Your body recognizes these as “normal” and virtually identical to the hormones produced in your body, which makes them far safer than synthetic prescription versions.

There are three types of estrogens commonly used in bioidentical hormone replacement therapy: estrone, estradiol, and estriol. A common mixed formulation known as Tri-est includes 80 percent estriol with 10 percent each of estrone and estradiol.

Estradiol is the primary human female hormone found in all premenopausal women, whereas estriol is produced in significant amounts during pregnancy. Estriol is considered the safest of the three and is the most commonly prescribed. It has been used safely for decades, and I believe it’s particularly useful when you’ve had a hysterectomy.

Unfortunately, there is still much unnecessary concern about bioidentical estrogen supplementation. What the FDA, most doctors, and patients do not realize is that bioidentical hormone supplements can actually optimize your health. That said, your hormone levels should ideally be monitored by either blood, urine, or saliva, to ensure they reach a target level that corresponds to the reference ranges for healthy young women. I also believe that menopausal hot flashes that do not resolve with phytoestrogens such as black cohosh, are another valid indication for short-term estrogen use. However, if estrogen is used, it is nearly always wise to use it in conjunction with natural progesterone.

The Best Way to Administer Bioidentical Hormones

Keep in mind that when it comes to administering bioidentical hormones, some delivery methods are clearly superior to others. Oral supplementation is perhaps your worst option, as your liver processes everything in your digestive tract first, before it enters your bloodstream, which will metabolize most of the swallowed hormones to inactive and potentially harmful derivatives. Any method that bypasses your liver will therefore be more effective.

Hormone creams are one common alternative that achieves this. However, since hormones are fat-soluble, they can build up in your fatty tissues and lead to having too much in your body. This in turn can disrupt other hormones. It’s also near impossible to accurately determine the dose when using a cream. Sublingual drops can be a good option, as it enters your blood stream directly and will not build up in your tissues like the cream can. It’s also much easier to determine the dose you’re taking, as each drop is about one milligram.

In the 90s, I prescribed transdermal progesterone cream based on the now deceased Dr. John Lee. That worked well for most of the women but after 3-6 months most started to lose the benefits. However, I now believe the ideal delivery method is via trans mucosal administration. For more information about this, please listen to my interview with Dr. Wright. Administration methods are discussed toward the end of this interview.

Read the whole article at: